Salud mental, consumo problemático de sustancias psicoactivas y capital de recuperación
Palabras clave:
trastorno mental, trastorno ´por uso de sustancias, capital de recuperaciónResumen
La recuperación de los trastornos mentales y de uso de sustancias no implica únicamente que se deje el consumo o la disminución de los síntomas. Es mucho más que simplemente participar en un tratamiento. Implica un proceso de largo plazo para aprender a vivir, resolver los problemas, lograr y mantener la recuperación. En la atención actual de los trastornos por consumo de sustancias, las personas profesionales de la salud evalúan la severidad o los riesgos de los trastornos mentales o trastornos por uso de sustancias, necesarios para trazar el plan de tratamiento. Sin embargo, la severidad de los trastornos tiene una desventaja que se orienta hacia los problemas y no hacia las fortalezas de las personas. Por lo que, si buscamos una recuperación de los trastornos mentales, es necesario incluir en la práctica de atención el concepto de capital de recuperación para alcanzar y sostener la recuperación a largo plazo.
Citas
Ashford, R.D. et al., (2018). Substance use, recovery, and linguistics: The impact of word choice on explicit and implicit bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 189,131–138.
Bromet, E., & Moos, R (1977). Environmental resources and the posttreatment functioning of alcoholic patients. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 18, 326-338.
Cano, I., Best, D., Edwards, M., & Lehman, J. (2017). Recovery capital pathways: modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug and alcohol dependence, 181, 11-19.
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., McClay, J., Murray, R., Harrington, H. (2005). Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: Longitudinal evidence of a gene x environment interaction. 57(10) 1117–1127.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (2009). What are Peer Recovery Support Services? HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4454. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Cloud, W. & Granfield, R. (2001). Natural recovery from substance dependency: Lessons for treatment providers. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 1(1), 83-104.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). NIDA Research Report Series: Comorbidity (p. 3). NIH Publication Number 10-5771. Bethesda.
Granfield, R. & Cloud, W. (1996). The elephant that no one sees: Natural recovery among middle-class addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 45-61.
Granfield, R. y Cloud, W. (1999). Coming Clean. Overcoming addiction without treatment.nNew York: New York University Press.
Hall, W., & Degenhardt, L. (2009). Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet, 374(9698), 1383–1391.
Humphreys, K., Moos, R. J., & Cohen, C. (1997). Social and community resources and long-term recovery from treated and untreated alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(3), 231-238.
Kaplowitz, S., & Johnston, M. V. (2004). The Effects of Physician Empathy on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037
Kaskutas, L. A., Bond, J., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effects of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction, 97(7), 891-900.
Kelly JF, Westerhoff CM. (2010). Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms. Int J Drug Policy. 21(3):202-7.
Laudet, A, Morgen, K., & White, W. (2006). The role of social supports, spirituality, religiousness, life meaning and affiliation with 12-step fellowships in quality of life satisfaction among individuals in recovery from alcohol and drug use. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 24(102), 33-73.
Mankowski, E.S., & Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. (2001). Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in twelve-step self-help groups following substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 537-563.
McPherson, C, & Boyne H. (2017). Using the Assessment Recovery Capital at an Addiction Treatment Centre: A Pilot Study to Validate Utility. ARC Journal of Addiction Volume 2, Issue 2, 2017, PP 17-23. www.arcjournals.org
Moos, R.H. y Moos, B. (2007), Protective resources and long-term recovery from alcohol abuse disorders, Drug and alcohol dependence, Vol. 86, No.1, pp 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.015
National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Agency Directors. (1998). National dialog on co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 31, 201. http://nasadad.org/national-dialogue-co-occurring-mental-health
National Institutes on Drug Abuse (2020). Common Comorbidities with Substance Use Disorders (NIDA Research Report). Bethesda. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK571451/.
Oficina de Asuntos Internacionales de Narcóticos y Aplicación de la Ley y Plan Colombo (2017). La prestación de servicio de apoyo a la recuperación: El modelo de recuperación PEER. Las experiencias de los/las pares Potencian la recuperación. Currículum Unirversal de Recuperación.
Oficina de Asuntos Internacionales de Narcóticos y Aplicación de la Ley; Plan Colombo y Comisióna Interamericana para el Control del Abuso de Drogas (2015). Trastornos mentales conumes y enfermedades médicas co-ocurrentes- Un enfoque general para profesionales en adicciones. Módulo 3 básico. Currículim Universal de Tratamiento.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra las Droga y el Delito (2024). Informe mundial sobre las drogas 2024. Publicación de las Naciones Unidad, 2024.
Pars E., VanDerNagel J., Dijkstra B., Schellekens A. (2023). Using the Recovery Capital Model to Explore Barriers to and Facilitators of Recovery in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder, Psychiatric Comorbidity and Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability: A Case Series. J Clin
Med. 2023 Sep 12;12(18):5914. doi:10.3390/jcm12185914.PMID:37762855; PMCID: PMC10531644.
Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M (2008) Making Recovery a Reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
Slade, M., Leamy, M., Bacon, F., Janosik, M., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Bird, V. (2012). International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiat
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP21-07-01-003, NSDUH Series H-56). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-39, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4609. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2005). CSAT Substance Abuse Treatment for persons with co-occuring disorders. Rockwille (mb); Treatments protocol service, No. 42.
White, W., & Cloud, W. (2008). Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor, 9(5), 22–27.
White, W. (2009). Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: Scientific rationale and promising practices. Chicago, IL: Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center, and Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health & Mental Retardation Services.
